Authors

Julie M. Vose, University of Nebraska Medical CenterFollow
Kai Fu, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lu Wang, Yantai University
Adnan Mansoor, University of Calgary
Douglas Stewart, University of Calgary
Hongxia Cheng, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lynette M. Smith, University of Nebraska Medical CenterFollow
Ji Yuan, Mayo Clinic
Hina Naushad Qureishi, University of Nebraska Medical Center
Brian K. Link, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics
Melissa H. Cessna, Intermountain Medical Center
Paul M. Barr, University of Rochester Medical Center
Brad S. Kahl, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
Matthew S. Mckinney, Duke University Medical Center
Nadia Khan, Fox Chase Cancer Center
Ranjana H. Advani, Stanford Cancer Institute
Peter Martin, Weill Cornell Medical College
Andre H. Goy, John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center
Tycel J. Phillips, University of Michigan Medical School
Amitkumar Mehta, University Of Alabama At Birmingham
Manali Kamdar, University of Colorado
Michael Crump, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre - University Health Network
Barbara Pro, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Christopher R. Flowers, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Caron A. Jacobson, Harvard Medical School
Sonali M. Smith, University of Chicago
Deborah M. Stephens, Huntsman Cancer Institute at University of Utah
Veronika Bachanova, University of Minnesota
Zhaohui Jin, Mayo Clinic
Shishou Wu, Qingdao University
Francisco Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Pallawi Torka, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Andrea Anampa-Guzmán, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Farshid Kashef, University at Buffalo
Xing Li, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Sunandini Sharma, University of Nebraska Medical CenterFollow
Timothy Greiner, University of Nebraska Medical CenterFollow
James O. Armitage, University of Nebraska Medical CenterFollow
Matthew A. Lunning, University of Nebraska Medical CenterFollow
Dennis D. Weisenburger, University of Nebraska Medical CenterFollow
Gregory Bociek, University of Nebraska Medical CenterFollow
Javeed Iqbal, University of Nebraska Medical CenterFollow
Guohua Yu, University of Nebraska Medical Center
Chengfeng Bi, University of Nebraska Medical CenterFollow
North American Mantle Cell Lymphoma Consortium

Document Type

Article

Journal Title

Journal of Hematology & Oncology

Publication Date

2023

Volume

16

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) exhibit a wide variation in clinical presentation and outcome. However, the commonly used prognostic models are outdated and inadequate to address the needs of the current multidisciplinary management of this disease. This study aims to investigate the clinical and pathological features of MCL in the immunochemotherapy era and improve the prognostic models for a more accurate prediction of patient outcomes.

METHODS: The North American Mantle Cell Lymphoma Project is a multi-institutional collaboration of 23 institutions across North America to evaluate and refine prognosticators for front-line therapy. A total of 586 MCL cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2012 are included in this study. A comprehensive retrospective analysis was performed on the clinicopathological features, treatment approaches, and outcomes of these cases. The establishment of novel prognostic models was based on in-depth examination of baseline parameters, and subsequent validation in an independent cohort of MCL cases.

RESULTS: In front-line strategies, the use of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was the most significant parameter affecting outcomes, for both overall survival (OS, p < 0.0001) and progression-free survival (PFS, p < 0.0001). P53 positive expression was the most significant pathological parameter correlating with inferior outcomes (p < 0.0001 for OS and p = 0.0021 for PFS). Based on the baseline risk factor profile, we developed a set of prognostic models incorporating clinical, laboratory, and pathological parameters that are specifically tailored for various applications. These models, when tested in the validation cohort, exhibited strong predictive power for survival and showed a stratification resembling the training cohort.

CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of patients with MCL has markedly improved over the past two decades, and further enhancement is anticipated with the evolution of clinical management. The innovative prognostic models developed in this study would serve as a valuable tool to guide the selection of more suitable treatment strategies for patients with MCL.

MeSH Headings

Adult, Humans, Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, North America

ISSN

1756-8722

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Share

COinS