•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Original Report

Disciplines

Educational Methods | Higher Education | Medical Education | Medicine and Health Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Teaching-learning methods include lectures, discussions, and small group activities. Small group discussions and role-plays enhance adult learning by promoting participation, reflection, communication, and teamwork. These methods improve knowledge retention and prepare students for real-life scenarios and professional challenges through experiential, interactive learning. Aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of Small Group Discussion (SGD) vs Role play as a teaching learning (T/L) method among Phase II medical students.

METHODS. Out of 140 Phase II MBBS students, 88 participated in the pharmacology schedule and were included in the study. After randomization, 42 students (Group A) underwent SGD, and 46 (Group B) participated in Role Play. Both groups completed pre- and post-tests, prescription writing, reflection, and a perception questionnaire.

RESULTS. The primary objective of evaluating the effectiveness of SGD vs Role play as T/L method was performed by comparing the mean scores of post-tests and written prescriptions. Mean Score of post-test was 6.53±1.40 and 6.11±1.33 of Group A & B, respectively (p>0.05). Mean score of prescriptions was 6.80±1.44 and 5.08±1.30 for Group A and Group B, respectively (p

CONCLUSION. Role play is effective for learning communication skills. SGD is better for understanding the clinical aspects of the topic. Both the methods hold their own importance as a teaching learning method.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32873/unmc.dc.gmerj.7.1.004

Keywords

Small Group Discussion, Role Play, Effectiveness, Reflection

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Figure 1.jpg (423 kB)
Figure 2.jpg (295 kB)
Figure 3.jpg (217 kB)
Table 1.docx (13 kB)
Table 2.docx (13 kB)
Table 3.docx (13 kB)

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.